Cracking Down on Ghosts

If it doesn't fit in any of the other forums, post it here!
Post Reply
P5 Guy
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:20 pm
Location: St Pete

Cracking Down on Ghosts

Post by P5 Guy »

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/us ... d=msedgntp
"This proposed rule would help keep guns out of the wrong hands and make it easier for law enforcement to trace guns used to commit violent crimes," said Attorney General Merrick Garland in a statement.

"Although this rulemaking will solve only one aspect of the problem, we have an obligation to do our part to keep our families and our neighborhoods safe from gun violence."
Casper the Friendly Ghostgun!
N4KVE
Posts: 979
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 1:59 pm
Location: PALM BEACH

Post by N4KVE »

Prices are already dropping from on line vendors. They don’t want to be stuck with inventory they can’t sell. GARY.
Search results: “polymer80 gen3”
Showing all 8 results

Polymer80 PF940V2FD G17/22 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer FDE

$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940V2GR G17/22 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer Gray

Rated 4.00 out of 5
$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940CV1G G19/23 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer Gray

$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940CV1B G19/23 Gen3 Compat
ss1
Posts: 235
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 2:24 pm
Location: Palm Beach

Post by ss1 »

N4KVE wrote: Sat May 08, 2021 12:56 pm Prices are already dropping from on line vendors. They don’t want to be stuck with inventory they can’t sell. GARY.
Search results: “polymer80 gen3”
Showing all 8 results

Polymer80 PF940V2FD G17/22 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer FDE

$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940V2GR G17/22 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer Gray

Rated 4.00 out of 5
$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940CV1G G19/23 Gen3 Compatible Frame Kit Polymer Gray

$174.72 $149.99
Add to cart

Polymer80 PF940CV1B G19/23 Gen3 Compat
Yeah, I was going to say braces and 80% kits are being ad targeted with "sales" from almost every vendor. Oddly they aren't as cheap as the sales of these things when things were really slow 2-3 years ago. The ban of bump stocks has made everyone realize that some things are not going to get grandfathered in. On a state level I'm even losing hope that I can un-lose my old binaries.
dammitgriff
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 11:06 am

Post by dammitgriff »

Pic of Creepy “ghost brain” Joe holding a ghost gun:
Image
zeebaron
Posts: 636
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:42 pm

Post by zeebaron »

They will also be requiring the serializing of all frame parts. Get ready for "pre-ban slides and uppers".

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulatio ... er/summary

The proposed rule is 115 pages:

https://www.atf.gov/rules-and-regulatio ... r-receiver
User avatar
NorincoKid
Posts: 783
Joined: Wed Jul 18, 2018 4:40 pm
Location: Spring Hill, Hernando County

Post by NorincoKid »

Page 21....
ATF bullshit Page 21 wrote:

"Further, this NPRM proposes new terms and definitions to take
into account technological developments and modern terminology in the firearms
industry, as well as amendments to the marking and recordkeeping requirements that
would be necessary to implement these definitions. However, nothing in this rule would
restrict persons not otherwise prohibited from possessing firearms from making their own
firearms at home without markings solely for personal use (not for sale or distribution) in
accordance with Federal, State, and local law
.
So....3d printed stuff apparently will be exempt from all this?

and...
More ATF bullshit wrote:
Nonetheless, this amendment is not intended to affect the classification of a
weapon, including a weapon parts kit, in which each frame or receiver (as defined in this
proposed rule) of such weapon is properly destroyed in accordance with ATF standards.
Because such weapons have been completely destroyed or permanently redesigned not to
expel a projectile by the action of an explosive, and cannot readily be converted to do so,
ATF would not consider them as either “designed to” or “readily assembled, completed,
converted, or restored to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive.” To make this
clear, this proposed rule would add another sentence to the end of the definition of
“firearm” in 27 CFR 478.11 to provide that “[t]he term shall not include a weapon,
including a weapon parts kit, in which each part defined as a frame or receiver of such
weapon is destroyed.”
So parts kits with a cut/demil receiver will be exempt from being "firearms"?
weaselfire
Posts: 105
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2018 2:21 pm

Post by weaselfire »


NorincoKid wrote:So parts kits with a cut/demil receiver will be exempt from being "firearms"?
Yup.

Jeff

Sent from my SM-G781U using Tapatalk

P5 Guy
Posts: 1311
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2018 1:20 pm
Location: St Pete

Post by P5 Guy »

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics ... d=msedgntp
But it is unclear how much serialized guns help law enforcement bring criminals to justice. The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (ATF) claims it used serial numbers to "process" requests to trace 450,000 guns in 2019. But it has never released figures on how many gun serial number traces have led to an arrest.


If traces were working they'd be bragging about it.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/compani ... d=msedgdhp
The executive actions Biden issued last month essentially called on agencies in his administration to tighten up regulations and compile reports. Among the actions Biden took, he wants to

Crack down on homemade firearms, which some hold as a historical American tradition;
Make pistol stabilizers subject to the National Firearms Act, which would put them in the same category as machine guns, sawed-off shotguns, and grenades;
Develop so-called model "red flag" laws that would allow states to strip gun owners of their firearms without due process if they were thought to be a danger to themselves or others; and
Nominate to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives an individual who has been described as a "fierce advocate for gun control."

Nothing to add to this?

https://www.thetrace.org/

:roll:
dammitgriff
Posts: 928
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2018 11:06 am

Post by dammitgriff »

Circumventing due process is a gross violation of the Constitution. How in the hell is it no one has sued the F* out of the feds over this by now?
Post Reply