Woods carry

State and national practical & political discussions on legal open, concealed and vehicle carry.

For Florida woods carry, what pistol do you prefer to carry?

.22lr
0
No votes
..38 Speical
4
6%
.357 magnum
21
34%
.44 magnum
9
15%
9mm
5
8%
40 S&W
4
6%
.357sig
0
No votes
10mm
11
18%
.45acp
6
10%
Other, please detail in a post
2
3%
 
Total votes: 62

User avatar
Deputydave
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Hillsborough
Contact:

Post by Deputydave »

Handgun Ammunition for Carrying in the Woods

http://www.marksmanshipmatters.com/hand ... the-woods/

Interesting conclusion: Notice that certain 9 mm loads penetrated as much as the most powerful calibers tested here. As far as penetration, is concerned it appears the bullet being used is more important than the caliber.
Survival and Emergency Preparedness https://www.sepboard.us
Mannlicher
Posts: 47
Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2018 4:39 pm

Post by Mannlicher »

for some 65+ years I was comfortable with just a .22 as a woods revolver. I have moved up to a .38 or .357 in the past few years
User avatar
lighteye
Posts: 272
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2018 9:49 pm
Location: Thonotosassa

Post by lighteye »

Good old 9x18 Mak in a CZ 82 the last couple of weeks. I carried my M&P40 for many years, but have been hiking lately with just a sling bag with essentials. Hogs dislike dogs, and also loud noises, so I'm relatively confident in my safety. An AR7 IS in the works, though :)
User avatar
Deputydave
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Hillsborough
Contact:

Post by Deputydave »

Currently the .357 Magnum is way out in front with double the votes of the next closest caliber, which is the 10mm. 40S&W has only several votes, of which one is mine. I've still got the Sig P250 as my dedicated 'woods carry' pistol. I see it as a 14-shot DAO 357 Magnum-comparable platform. Thought about a 357sig barrel for it but essentially I think a 40 S&W is just as good, if not better since I can go heavy with it.

Surprisingly the .22lr has zero votes right now. I'd have figured that would a be a popular caliber for the woods.
Survival and Emergency Preparedness https://www.sepboard.us
User avatar
Deputydave
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Hillsborough
Contact:

Post by Deputydave »

Traded off my P250 so I'll need to figure out another woods carry platform.

Still surprised that 22lr has zero votes. :?:
Survival and Emergency Preparedness https://www.sepboard.us
FloridaMan
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2022 3:57 pm

Post by FloridaMan »

Just out of curiosity, why the larger rimfire rounds for FL woods carry? In my experience, the worst you’re likely to encounter is a moccasin, maybe an ornery young boar but those usually clear out way before you even see them. Black bears run like heck when they hear you and panthers are like unicorns. If it’s skunk apes you’re worried about, they can jam your gun psychically anyway. 🛸 🦶

That said, camping I carry a smaller 9 like a Sig 365 or a CZ P10 S on my hip and leave an AR in the tent. For just hikes or fishing I carry the Sig. If it’s a colder day which we’ve been getting more of in recent years I slap on a Colt 1911 Government or a metal Cz 75.
“The further a society drifts from the truth the more they will hate those that speak it.”

— George Orwell
User avatar
Deputydave
Posts: 587
Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 11:56 am
Location: Hillsborough
Contact:

Post by Deputydave »

Deputydave wrote: Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:48 am Traded off my P250 so I'll need to figure out another woods carry platform.

Still surprised that 22lr has zero votes. :?:
As I mentioned previously, I traded off the P250 quite a while ago. I purchased a Gen 3 Glock 21 police trade-in for a dedicated woods carry pistol. Got if for $399 at Shark Coast Tactical down in Sarasota.
FloridaMan wrote: Wed May 04, 2022 4:08 pm Just out of curiosity, why the larger rimfire rounds for FL woods carry?
Not really needed overall for the reasons you mentioned. My first concern in the woods is a rabid animal. As such I want to be able to put it down as rapidly as possible. As much as I like a revolver, I think a semi-auto is a better choice overall because of capacity. If you're out in the wilds...you're out in the wilds. Which means you may not have quick access to more rounds as well as you are your own cavalierly.

A second reason is that the universal signal for rescue is three of something i.e. three signal fires, three flags, three X's and of course three shots in the air spaced a few seconds apart. If you have to signal for rescue you're in a bad way to begin with. So having more rounds in which to do so is only a benefit.
Survival and Emergency Preparedness https://www.sepboard.us
Post Reply