Firemedic2000 wrote: ↑Thu Dec 13, 2018 12:05 am
Greg wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 6:38 am
FfNJGTFO wrote: ↑Sat Dec 08, 2018 1:28 am
Actually, it would go well for them. If they're going to go "door to door," they're going "assault/raid" style with the battering ram, etc. They don't mess around. And if on of theirs gets whacked, they will turn over every rock and hard place until they find the perp.... who will, most assuredly, have the "boating acccident..." along with oall those high capacity mags...
Perhaps once or twice in the beginning. Until citizens start fighting back and targeting those Troopers who are going door to door and those troopers homes. Tit for tat
You mean the trooper that are dressed in the NAZI type uniforms right.
Armed AMERICA far far out numbers LE and the MILITARY combined. If it were to hit the fan in NJ the jack boot thugs would not stand a chance against the citizens. That's why the government's of AMERICA fears an armed POPULATION so much and want us all disarmed.
Which is precisely what they wish to achieve. One ossifer coming to the door, the residents dropping to their knees in terror, fully complying with demands completely contrary to the memory of a Constitution.
Consider the following. There have been many analyses, crunching numbers and estimating percentages coming up with the number of resisting citizens. Some results seem to be reasonable. Then, they compare it to the number of military and police, which do indeed come up short. Actually, it's worse for them if free citizens stick together ("aye, there's the rub."). The real problem is, it cannot be accomplished by a single officer or soldier (setting aside the "posse comitatus" issue which, if ignored would incite and justify more opposition), So, a team is needed to attack a house with an armed citizen. That reduces by easily a factor of 4 the number of homes which can be attacked at any given time. Any estimate of a ratio, to be realistic, must take that into consideration. The citizens have more power than many think.
To be sure, the first 2 weeks of any such campaign will be the worst. There are many people in this country who have been sheltered, to whom nothing has ever happened, who have never been jerked around. In a way, I feel sorry for them (I would, if they didn't insist my kind was the problem.), they will be easy marks. After that, and the word gets around, then it's SHTF for the "authorities".
Why? I suspect at some point the "Big 0" NDAA will be used. The emergency won't matter, it may be real or made up, war/disaster/alien invasion all the same. We needn't go to the wilder conspiracy theories, just look at what happened in Europe after WWII, many countries with stronger land laws than ours. Soldiers came to the door with true assault weapons and bayonets, and "OUT!". There are members on this board who have grandparents who experienced it. Guns do indeed override laws. People with something to sell say, "Land is what lasts. They aren't making more. They can't put it on their backs and run off with it." No one considers they can take you off the land (or, out of your house). The enabling legislation exists. The politicians are going more radical. It is not too far a stretch, with some who have been elected, and their numbers growing in the next election, getting open borders. Where will they house the "poor masses?" You, you old fart (and I'm an even older fart) don't need that house. It's all been done before. A uniformed thug at the door, and full compliance, Utopia by the stroke of a pen. It's a fork in the road, only in our case, we better be careful which we take.