Page 3 of 3
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2020 12:37 pm
by Casual
Without going to far down the rabbit hole. You should support O.C on principle alone. Weve had it here in Texas for a while now... no issues what so ever. No tards either really to speak of doing O.C shit that ive observed.
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2020 1:48 pm
by lakelandman
zeebaron wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 11:12 am
lakelandman wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 10:28 am
zeebaron wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 12:01 am
With 20% unemployment predicted, crime is gonna go through the roof. Maybe Florida finally gets open carry? lol...
Pass on open carry I want them to think I'm a victim why paint a target on yourself?
In a normally functioning society, I would agree with you. However, what we're about to enter is...yeah. Dissuading them by sight alone might make the difference between life or death.
Good point.
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2020 2:32 pm
by REDinFL
I go back and forth about OC. While I can appreciate the idea of showing “I’m prepared, so move along elsewhere!” I do have to wonder if a potential perp might think he/she/it can run up with a hammer and whack me in the head if they see an OC pistol. Yeah, I know, one is supposed to have situational awareness, but some things can happen pretty quickly.
I’ll stay with CC, but would fully support OC, just to avoid official “eagerness”.
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2020 3:46 pm
by tector
I support the legality of OC because I believe in the liberty interest of the individual to choose how they exercise their Second Amendment rights and their natural right to self-defense. That different people might make different choices depending on the circumstances is exactly why such liberty should exist.
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Wed Mar 18, 2020 10:15 pm
by Casual
tector wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 3:46 pm
I support the legality of OC because I believe in the liberty interest of the individual to choose how they exercise their Second Amendment rights and their natural right to self-defense. That different people might make different choices depending on the circumstances is exactly why such liberty should exist.
Well said
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 6:03 am
by Firemedic2000
tector wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 3:46 pm
I support the legality of OC because I believe in the liberty interest of the individual to choose how they exercise their Second Amendment rights and their natural right to self-defense. That different people might make different choices depending on the circumstances is exactly why such liberty should exist.
We need a hand clapping emoji
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:10 am
by osprey21
tector wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 3:46 pm
I support the legality of OC because I believe in the liberty interest of the individual to choose how they exercise their Second Amendment rights and their natural right to self-defense. That different people might make different choices depending on the circumstances is exactly why such liberty should exist.
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:52 am
by n0rlf
osprey21 wrote: ↑Thu Mar 19, 2020 8:10 am
tector wrote: ↑Wed Mar 18, 2020 3:46 pm
I support the legality of OC because I believe in the liberty interest of the individual to choose how they exercise their Second Amendment rights and their natural right to self-defense. That different people might make different choices depending on the circumstances is exactly why such liberty should exist.
Ditto! Very well said
Re: More panic induced economic impact
Posted: Thu Mar 19, 2020 11:40 am
by TACC
I agree, exactly, exhibits the importance of individual liberty.
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk