I swear to Christ if the GOP blows this Supreme Court nomination...

[joel]

Oh, look--our troll is back. My lucky day to deal with complete douchebags on FSN.

i'm genuinely not a troll. i may have opposing views from time but i've never engaged in what anyone would call trolling.

i've always tried to maturely and sincerely discuss issues here. i'd love to hear more about how this is, "the Stalingrad of the war on white, straight, Christian men..."

we talk about fairness but i think about how we (conservatives) behaved when obama wanted to bring merrick garland before the confirmation committee. if you want to talk about stalingrad against white christian males, consider how many times you guys called obama nigger publicly here and almost certainly in private etc. if the shifting demographics of the US makes you anxious then you're probably a douchebag. if you're more concerned with preserving white christian male power in the US than having an honest and law abiding supreme court judge, then you're probably a douchebag.

can any of you sincerely say that you think kavanaugh was being truthful? if you don't think he was being truthful, do you really want a liar and assaulter on your surpreme court?

Yes, as Tector said, our troll is back!!
You, sir, are less than a troll.
You are a crumbsnatching POS
(and your post above confirms it)

[rug357]

Why is he so angry or tearful if there isn't any truth to it? I would expect someone falsely accused to be a little indignant but composed, succinct, and open.

Mike,

You married? Are you raising any young kids?

[rug357]

I'd expect someone who was truly innocent to call for further investigation to clear his name.

F*** NO!
That's exactly what they want...more time.
No more time and Flake should be hung up by his toe!

[mikem]

Oh, look--our troll is back. My lucky day to deal with complete douchebags on FSN.

i'm genuinely not a troll. i may have opposing views from time but i've never engaged in what anyone would call trolling.

i've always tried to maturely and sincerely discuss issues here. i'd love to hear more about how this is, "the Stalingrad of the war on white, straight, Christian men..."

we talk about fairness but i think about how we (conservatives) behaved when obama wanted to bring merrick garland before the confirmation committee. if you want to talk about stalingrad against white christian males, consider how many times you guys called obama nigger publicly here and almost certainly in private etc. if the shifting demographics of the US makes you anxious then you're probably a douchebag. if you're more concerned with preserving white christian male power in the US than having an honest and law abiding supreme court judge, then you're probably a douchebag.

can any of you sincerely say that you think kavanaugh was being truthful? if you don't think he was being truthful, do you really want a liar and assaulter on your surpreme court?

Yes, as Tector said, our troll is back!!
You, sir, are less than a troll.
You are a crumbsnatching POS
(and your post above confirms it)

ouch! it doesn't take long for you ladies to go all ad hominem here. did i say anything false?

[mikem]

Why is he so angry or tearful if there isn't any truth to it? I would expect someone falsely accused to be a little indignant but composed, succinct, and open.

Mike,

You married? Are you raising any young kids?

i can say that i think i understand where you're going with this but an innocent person should have nothing to fear -- family and or children or not.

i can reveal that i'm transgender (she/her) but i've been married and i have children so i think i understand.

[mikem]

I'd expect someone who was truly innocent to call for further investigation to clear his name.

F*** NO!
That's exactly what they want...more time.
No more time and Flake should be hung up by his toe!

why the rush to push through a life time appointment? seriously -- why not fully vet this guy before giving him a life time gig? this is a serious question. i'm genuinely curious.

[jjk308]

I'd expect someone who was truly innocent to call for further investigation to clear his name.

F*** NO!
That's exactly what they want...more time.
No more time and Flake should be hung up by his toe!

why the rush to push through a life time appointment? seriously -- why not fully vet this guy before giving him a life time gig? this is a serious question. i'm genuinely curious.

A real serious question: DO YOU REALLY THINK THAT THIS INVESTIGATION IS GOING TO FIND ANYTHING THE PREVIOUS 6 INVESTIGATIONS DIDN'T? Kavanaugh is, beyond a question of a doubt from anyone but a rabid Trump hater, militant feminist or scheming Democratic politician/slimeball, the best qualified nominee for the Supreme Court that we've seen in decades.

The "Rush" - (and the fact is that this confirmation process has gone on too long already) is to avoid the delay those scheming Democratic politician/slimeballs want, to push the confirmation process out long enough in the hope that they'll win a Senate majority in the midterms. They want CONTROL of the Supreme Court, the real power center in the US government since the Democratic ideologues have decided to stop working with the Republicans and the Administration.

Anyone who doesn't recognize this has to be categorized as a died in the wool core supporter of the Progressive agenda. If you aren't, please open your eyes and engage your brain.

[joel]

i'm genuinely not a troll.

i've always tried to maturely and sincerely discuss issues here.

consider how many times you guys called obama nigger publicly here and almost certainly in private etc. if the shifting demographics of the US makes you anxious then you're probably a douchebag. if you're more concerned with preserving white christian male power in the US than having an honest and law abiding supreme court judge, then you're probably a douchebag.

Yes, as Tector said, our troll is back!!
You, sir, are less than a troll.
You are a crumbsnatching POS
(and your post above confirms it)

ouch! it doesn't take long for you ladies to go all ad hominem here. did i say anything false?

For starters?

[pharmer]

[/quote]
why the rush to push through a life time appointment? seriously -- why not fully vet this guy before giving him a life time gig? this is a serious question. i'm genuinely curious.
[/quote]

Because his "body of judicial work" as well as exemplary personal and public life prove him to be eminently qualified for the SC. Mass quantities of irrelevant liberal media douchebaggery be damned and buried. Joe

[Skoll]

I don't think a 7th FBI investigation is going to turn up anything new, but that's just me.