Try to imagine any of the Founders hearing of this type of idiocy, most specifically from the Federal government, which was supposed to be one of limited, enumerated (only) powers. About as insane as a government being able to tell you what plant you can grow.wjbarricklow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:37 pm Whole thing is ridiculous anyway.
I get the idea of banning short barreled shotgun and rifles when they had handguns in the bill. You can't ban handguns when everyone owns a saw. So you have to ban short rifles and shotguns, too.
Taking handguns out of the bill and banning the shotguns and rifles was absolutely stupid. It's ridiculous that almost a hundred years later we're having to argue the most absurd technicalities of the law.
Looks like braced pistols are SBR’s.
“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.”
I just came across some people talking about a 922.r issue now with this ruling, on imported pistols with braces not complying...
Only recourse is destruction, not a form 1 sbr issue... a 922.r issue
PCC's... B&T? Etc
Only recourse is destruction, not a form 1 sbr issue... a 922.r issue
PCC's... B&T? Etc
If you haven't done so already, here's where you can send an email off to your representatives in Congress and the Senate.
https://www.gunowners.org/na01162023/
https://www.gunowners.org/na01162023/
Didn’t affect me. First of all, my SBR’s were created before the brace loophole existed. One is a V51P, a HK91 pistol, so it obviously has the HK collapsible stock. The other is a milled AK Krink, with the underfolder stock. It was built as a rifle with a pinned phony suppressor which was removed when the stamp arrived. So neither of my SBR’s would have worked with a brace. And from what I’ve observed, most braced pustols are US made AR15’s where 922 is moot. GARY.wjbarricklow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:30 pmWell, that's not fair to you, having spent all that money to register your SBRs.N4KVE wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 10:36 amPeople have been doing that for years. Nobody ever said that was illegal because the buffer tube is not a stock, & is required for an AR to work. GARY.wjbarricklow wrote: ↑Fri Jan 20, 2023 8:08 am
What's the ATF going to do when people just start putting the buffer tubes up to their shoulders? All AR pistols are SBRs?
AK-vN4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 8:57 pmDidn’t affect me. First of all, my SBR’s were created before the brace loophole existed. One is a V51P, a HK91 pistol, so it obviously has the HK collapsible stock. The other is a milled AK Krink, with the underfolder stock. It was built as a rifle with a pinned phony suppressor which was removed when the stamp arrived. So neither of my SBR’s would have worked with a brace. And from what I’ve observed, most braced pustols are US made AR15’s where 922 is moot. GARY.wjbarricklow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:30 pmWell, that's not fair to you, having spent all that money to register your SBRs.
B&t KH9, APC, GHM
Stribog
Mp5 type
Lwrc .45
Scorpion Evo
There a lot that are not AR based
This could be a blessing. I mean that in the sense of challenging the entire rule making bullshit process of the ATF. The more drastic the consequences of that rule making, the more skeptical a conservative court might be.Casual wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:25 pmAK-vN4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 8:57 pmDidn’t affect me. First of all, my SBR’s were created before the brace loophole existed. One is a V51P, a HK91 pistol, so it obviously has the HK collapsible stock. The other is a milled AK Krink, with the underfolder stock. It was built as a rifle with a pinned phony suppressor which was removed when the stamp arrived. So neither of my SBR’s would have worked with a brace. And from what I’ve observed, most braced pustols are US made AR15’s where 922 is moot. GARY.wjbarricklow wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 12:30 pm
Well, that's not fair to you, having spent all that money to register your SBRs.
B&t KH9, APC, GHM
Stribog
Mp5 type
Lwrc .45
Scorpion Evo
There a lot that are not AR based
“Democracy is a pathetic belief in the collective wisdom of individual ignorance.”
Yestector wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 11:07 pmThis could be a blessing. I mean that in the sense of challenging the entire rule making bullshit process of the ATF. The more drastic the consequences of that rule making, the more skeptical a conservative court might be.Casual wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 9:25 pmAK-vN4KVE wrote: ↑Sun Jan 22, 2023 8:57 pm
Didn’t affect me. First of all, my SBR’s were created before the brace loophole existed. One is a V51P, a HK91 pistol, so it obviously has the HK collapsible stock. The other is a milled AK Krink, with the underfolder stock. It was built as a rifle with a pinned phony suppressor which was removed when the stamp arrived. So neither of my SBR’s would have worked with a brace. And from what I’ve observed, most braced pustols are US made AR15’s where 922 is moot. GARY.
B&t KH9, APC, GHM
Stribog
Mp5 type
Lwrc .45
Scorpion Evo
There a lot that are not AR based
The more people this screws over the louder the opposition (hopefully).
-
- Posts: 294
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2018 7:38 pm
- Location: Ft Lauderdale
I don't have any SBR's or braces so I don't have a dog in this hunt, but I stumbled across this vid that MAY be of interest to you.
I'll tell you what rule we applied sir.
We applied rule 303.
We caught them and we shot them under rule 303!
Harry "Breaker" Morant
We applied rule 303.
We caught them and we shot them under rule 303!
Harry "Breaker" Morant
Hope this doesn’t slow down the approval times of Form 4’s. GARY.