Trump to Piers Morgan: ‘We’re Going to Seriously Look’ At Banning Suppressors
Posted: Wed Jun 05, 2019 2:14 pm
Come and meet with Florida's finest shooters.
https://www.floridashootersnetwork.com/
Now, from a 2A standpoint did he make some inconsistent statements there? Yep - you betcha. He tends to do that on a lot of things. But he's hardly adopted a frothing-at-the-mouth Schumer / Pelosi / Feinstein - esque attitude on gun rights. We all seem to want a president that channels the ghosts of Jeff Cooper and Charlton Heston, but they didn't run for the office because, well, they were dead. Does anyone think Hillary would have ever said of the Bataclan incident "if there was a gun on the other side it would have never happened?" We forget how close the last two elections came to handing us a very different reality - at both the state and federal levels.While it’s dangerous to put too much credence into his off-the-cuff comments, President Trump seemed to indicate that he’ll consider banning suppressors as a response to the shooting in Virginia Beach.
“Well, I’d like to think about it. I’m going to seriously look at it.”
On the other side of the equation, he defended civilian firearm ownership. When talking about the Bataclan Theatre massacre, the President told Morgan . . .
“If there was a gun on the other side it would have never happened.”
When asked why people want to own semi-automatic rifles, the President said . . .
“A lot of them use them for entertainment. They go out and shoot at ranges.”
On the discussion of gun rights, the President bounced all over the place. It appears that the President is in favor of banning suppressors, but defended the fact that armed law-abiding people stop armed criminals and smacked Morgan down by pointing out London’s rampant knife-related crime.
He jumped from targeting the Second Amendment to defending the individual right to keep and bear arms. So is he a firearms friend or foe? You decide and let us know in the comments.
Maybe The Donald is not too pleased his kids own such things?Mohel_Knives wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:20 am Odessaman. His sons are NFA owners specifically Suppressors, I think they will intercede long before anything is truly discussed.
I doubt that.P5 Guy wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 1:55 pmMaybe The Donald is not too pleased his kids own such things?Mohel_Knives wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:20 am Odessaman. His sons are NFA owners specifically Suppressors, I think they will intercede long before anything is truly discussed.
In the silencerco interview Donny JR said that he has shot them on weekend hunting trips however as a New York resident he cannot own oneMohel_Knives wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:20 am Odessaman. His sons are NFA owners specifically Suppressors, I think they will intercede long before anything is truly discussed.
Because, it's not like he could have a trust or LLC based in another state and keep them locked up in his hunting cabin. I'm sure that no one in New York ever does that.rentprop1 wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 10:43 pmIn the silencerco interview Donny JR said that he has shot them on weekend hunting trips however as a New York resident he cannot own oneMohel_Knives wrote: ↑Thu Jun 06, 2019 11:20 am Odessaman. His sons are NFA owners specifically Suppressors, I think they will intercede long before anything is truly discussed.