Florida Shooters Network

Here's link to story about 2 off duty armed SECURITY Guards still in uniform outside of no fire arms zone. Holding signs with other Trump supporters. But apparently some liberals felt intimidated even though they were not approached or blocked from voting.
Think about this for a moment. These two people in the article were in uniform while ARMED. They were not in fatigues holding rifles like vigilantes or even acting aggressive. Wtf would some liberal pos think armed uniformed security guards were a threat. Oh I know......they were at the tent where people were holding Trump signs. So they purposely lied and called it armed men.

Bunch of pos SOCIALIST EXTREMISTS lying again just to put out fake news. But notice the difference from the below story where there actually was voter intimidation and nothing was done.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/investig ... story.html

But either way it was nothing like what the black panthers did at the polls. Who did intimidate voters and block entrance to polling place. Hugh difference between the two. But what these thugs did was OK and nothing was done. Notice also how it was covered up by CNN. If I remember correctly one older lady entrance to vote was blocked by club carrying thugs.

https://www.cnn.com/2016/11/05/politics ... index.html

Keep those assholes in mind, for when SHTF. Yeah, I know. It's time.

Are FL security guards allow to carry "off-duty"? It was my understanding their "G"(?) license only permitted on-the-job carry and while traveling between assignments...

Don't know but I guess the sheriff thought they did. Think about what was said in the article, no laws were broken

REDinFL wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 6:58 pm Keep those assholes in mind, for when SHTF. Yeah, I know. It's time.

If you ever need ammo if a shtf I'll take care of you

Firemedic2000 wrote: ↑Thu Oct 22, 2020 10:07 pm Don't know but I guess the sheriff thought they did. Think about what was said in the article, no laws were broken

Cops aren't lawyers...

493.6115 Weapons and firearms.—
(1) The provisions of this section shall apply to all licensees in addition to the other provisions of this chapter.
(2) Only Class “C,” Class “CC,” Class “D,” Class “M,” Class “MA,” or Class “MB” licensees are permitted to bear a firearm and any such licensee who bears a firearm shall also have a Class “G” license.
(3) No employee shall carry or be furnished a weapon or firearm unless the carrying of a weapon or firearm is required by her or his duties, nor shall an employee carry a weapon or firearm except in connection with those duties. When carried pursuant to this subsection, the weapon or firearm shall be encased in view at all times except as provided in subsection (4).

Section 493.6115(3), F.S.
• A Class “D” Security Officer licensee performing armed
duties authorized by her or his employer is not required to
disarm:
1. When carrying a firearm outside the client’s property
line, provided that the carrying of the firearm is in
connection with the security duties performed for the
client and is within a half-mile radius of the client’s
property; or,
2. When traveling from one armed site to another
armed site, provided the site-to-site transfer is directed
by her or his employing agency and the employing
agency does not require the licensee to disarm; or,
3. When traveling directly to and from home to
reach and leave a client’s site at which armed security
services have been requested by the client, provided
that the licensee is in uniform, notwithstanding Section
493.6115(4), Florida Statutes, and has written direction
or approval from her or his employing agency; or,
4. While performing tasks during duty hours such as
refueling an agency-owned vehicle, purchasing carryout
food or beverage, or taking a restroom break, provided
such activities are carried out within a two-mile radius
of the licensee’s assigned duty post or the licensee is
traveling armed as stated in subsection (3); or,
5. While rendering emergency humanitarian assistance
or providing assistance to a law enforcement officer
when requested by that law enforcement officer; or,
6. Unless expressly required to do so by law or her
or his employer. In such circumstances, unless the
firearm is being transferred to another security officer,
which shall require a clearing barrel to facilitate
transfer, the firearm shall be securely encased in a glove
compartment, gun case, or closed box or container that
requires a lid to be opened for access.

Good morning TN

Help me out here if you would. I read FSS 493.6115 After [3] as provided in sub section 4. The wording seems to be different.
Where in 493.6115 did you find the part about Class D Security Officer Licensee performing armed duties authorized by his or her employer is not required to disarm: I just don't see it. I know it's early in the morning, I've been wrong before and probably am this time also. I just don't see subsection 4 under 493.6115.Help an old blind man out her so I can find it. No disrespect here I just don't see it. Thank you for your time.

Wtf would some liberal pos think armed uniformed security guards were a threat.

Ha, ha, you used liberal and think in the same sentence.

Dr. Dickie wrote: ↑Fri Oct 23, 2020 6:32 am

Wtf would some liberal pos think armed uniformed security guards were a threat.

Ha, ha, you used liberal and think in the same sentence.

Got me...that's a good one

Hey tenzing I just posted the news article and what the SHERIFF said about it. Don't post the law here for us. Send the law to the sheriff if you think he was wrong and should have arrested the armed SECURITY GUARDS for breaking some law.

But what I posted has nothing really to do about that law or is not even why I posted it. The SHERIFF already decided that aspect of the law for all of us already. You wasted alot of time I believe.

It's the point that some idoit even thought, considered, insinuated or whatever. That two armed uniformed security guards were even a threat in the first place.

Just because they happen to be seen at a tent during rain where Trump supporters were holding signs. Who ever called it in as two armed men did so thinking this would be a stunt to make TRUMP/SUPPORTERS look bad and that we were interfering with the election. By some how threatening voters or intimidating. Who unlike in the other NEWS article did not stand at the doors of the polling location blocking people holding a club.

Then for someone to tell reporters that Trump hired armed men as poll watchers. Who were 250 ft from the polling location. The press ate it up and in initial story lied about it. Without as usual verifying anything.

Then to findout the next day none of that was true. TRUMP campaign did not hire them. The rest is in the articles. But how many NEWS MEDIA outlets posted a retraction on their previous story about Trump's armed poll watchers

I posted this to just show the difference between actual voter intimidation at the polls and made up B.S. yet when it was proven that these FBHO Black Panthers poll watchers did in fact block some people from voting. Absolutely nothing was done. That is what you should have researched and posted about. Not about SECURITY GUARDS that the SHERIFF said were not breaking any laws.

If you think sheriff was wrong email his office. Posting the law here is useless and can be contested by interpitation of the law.